Registered Users
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

43 FNG

About rote7

  • Rank
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Location
    The sprawl
  • Preferred Side
  • Preferred Branch
    Air Force
  • Preferred Unit
  1. Seconded, it would be very useful to see order before spawning in. We would need an opportunity to cancel spawn and/or disable the FMS checkbox within the proposed splash screen.
  2. First of all, welcome to the world of flying in WWIIOL. You will die countless times and you will like it. Also, I don't think you will be able to fly in a coordinated manner let alone win a dogfight without a joystick. With that out of the way, always lock your tail wheel before taking off. The tail wheel should be unlocked only for doing tight turns while taxiing. For normal turns, you can use left or right brake to steer your plane with the tail wheel locked. EDIT If you should decide to buy the Logitech 3D pro as recommended by aismov, there are a couple of config settings to help coping with the involuntary movement in the Z-Axis (twisting of the joystick, normally mapped to rudders). Contact me here on the boards if you need help with that.
  3. On Windows: * press the Windows key and type "programs" * select "Add or remove programs", scroll through the list of installed programs, left click on "Battleground Europe" * select "uninstall" * follow instructions on screen
  4. Please hop over to the 64bit and you Soldier thread. Many questions concerning 64bit were answered or at least discussed there. TL;DR * better performance and 64bit: it depends, the core game engine design will most probably be still the same (single game loop) * multithreading: it depends, we hope so * awesome job of the programmers/volunteers so far: definitely
  5. @ian77 From the closed thread, I saw this to late to reply in proper form: Instead of a lengthy essay I think you will understand best that I am not what you insinuate if I reply with a heart felt "F' you".
  6. OMG, torches!!!!
  7. Sweet jesus, I am at a loss for words. This thing was held in 2005 and as I posted before, noone complained. Not even the highly alert Central Council of Jews in Germany. So put that overly pc bs where it belongs.
  8. Somehow the organizers of the pictured event thought differently and we didn't have a single public outcry, not even from the Central Council of Jews in germany. There is such a thing as overthinking.
  9. Yet the main argument for "fix the MG34" was the weight of the weapon and not primarily its classification as an LMG. Now all weapons with a similar weight will get the same treatment with the exclusion of the BAR, which weight wise is leaning more to the heavier side and therefore could easily be in the "fix this as well" weapon group. It is not and won't be, fine with me. If we want to argue semantics, here is what I have taken from the posts of some players in this thread: In real life the BAR (being twice as heavy as the FG42) is an automatic rifle, therefore it is not an LMG. The FG 42, which stands for FallschirmjägerGewehr (Gewehr => Rifle), is not exclusively full auto but should be classified as an LMG because of its rate of fire. It is an favor to the Axis playerbase that it was not classified as such in game. Did I interpret anything wrong?
  10. Now now ... now you are insinuating. If i wanted to be smug I would say that I am simply interested in historical correctness but I won't descend to that. ;o) Since the whole argument seemed to be centered around the weight of the weapons I was simply curious why the, weight wise admittely somewhat inbetween, BAR is not classified as an LMG even if the official US army doctrine called it an automatic squad support weapon. Also, as csm said, the BAR is available in much greater numbers than the FG42 (which is historically correct) but I fear we will have heated discussions in a few weeks about bunker rushing BARs while the MG34 can't do that anymore and there are not enough FG42s to counter that.
  11. Is the weight difference BAR vs. FG42 taken into account when calculating stamina loss and inertia?
  12. Xoom, I am not insinuating anything, I don't use such complicated words unless I have to. So the BAR is almost twice as heavy as the FG42 and still considered as maneuverable? I guess this is the sentence you are referring to: "It combined the characteristics and firepower of a light machine gun in a lightweight form no larger than the standard-issue Kar 98k bolt-action rifle." To put a 10lbs weapon in the same class as the much heavier MG34 would be silly, wouldn't it? My original question arose from the designation of the BAR as a "sole automatic fire support weapon" vs. "selective fire automatic rifle" in Kar98 format for the FG42.
  13. As I said, I am not an infantry weapon specialist hence I have to resort to wikipedia and from what I have read they were designed with different goals in mind: BAR The BAR was issued as the sole automatic fire support for a twelve-man squad,[46] and all men were trained at the basic level how to operate and fire the weapon in case the designated operators were killed or wounded. At the start of the war, infantry companies designated three-man BAR teams, a gunner, an assistant gunner, and an ammunition bearers who carried additional magazines for the gun. By 1944, some units were using one-man BAR teams, with the other riflemen in the squad detailed to carry additional magazines or bandoliers of .30 ammunition. FG42 The FG 42 (German: Fallschirmjägergewehr 42, "paratrooper rifle 42") is a selective-fire automatic rifle[1][2] produced in [censored] Germany during World War II. The weapon was developed specifically for the use of the Fallschirmjägerairborne infantry in 1942 and was used in very limited numbers until the end of the war. It combined the characteristics and firepower of a light machine gun in a lightweight form no larger than the standard-issue Kar 98k bolt-action rifle.
  14. Just a quick question: Why is the BAR not included in the list of weapons that can't be fired on the move? Disclaimer: My main occupation in game is flying but as far as I understand the BAR is a support weapon as well.
  15. I see what you did there. (: Sure, std::vector would be good choice for that. It was just an example of how to use the individual bits of a number to store data.