kazee

Registered Users
  • Content count

    259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kazee

  1. Yes I understand your point and it makes sense, however getting to Maldegem is much more difficult than u make it out to be Brux and Gent must at least be somewhat buffered by capping 2-3 linking towns to them, major task...my main point is getting into Maldegem is no easy achievement But yea if u wanna open Breskens to Knokke, I am all for it, and I am sure the DD captains are for it too
  2. If you open up Breskens to Knokke, the Allied side will create a much bigger problem for themselves then trying to fix this so called "Maldegem" issue If Axis are in Gent pushing onto Maldegem, the zeelands should be a minor concern to allied forces' You open Breskins to the coastline, axis will just push zeelands hard, cap Breskens, then 3 more caps along the 'new' coast line and para into England and hit factory towns once the Oostende supply line is open...all this could be done in what 4-5 days ? And its over...(under current game rules with no town based supply) There is a reason Killer & Doc did not connect Breskens and Knokke, and i would bet it would be to benefit the allied side...they maybe thought, make the axis side go through Gent Maldegem Brugge to get to coastline, not just surf the coast
  3. Sweet !! Nice work...hope to be one of your first subscribers
  4. Totally agree there buddy, the last thing I want to see is someone feel bad about a mistake that was made. I know if I did it I would feel terrible and thats the last thing I want, is someone to feel that way. Thats not what we are here for, we all want to have fun and enjoy the game with our friends...thats about it...and maybe see some hot chicks in off-topic forum too
  5. !S Pete, You see that is the problem, or atleast how I see it...let us know what will be different beforehand and let us the playerbase decide if thats what we want or not, if that is not done once again and changes put in place...we will be in this same stage of people upset over changes that were made but maybe not the changes that are popular or even wanted. A few things I would propose is: 1. Let the Allied HC decide on what divisions are placed where and which divisions are removed once American divs come to map. Now for the record my plan is not to allow French divisions and BEF divisions to be rotated from south to north but to allow say the BEF 1st Division in Breda to be replaced by American 1st Div. in Breda then that BEF division is removed from map all together. Now its gets a bit tricky overtime because say a week or two later the AHC wishes to swap those divisions again, there needs to be some sort of time lapse in play and it should be probably 24-48 hours must pass once the command is giving to swap the different country divisions. It cant be done on the fly or in a matter of hours, that doesn't seem correct 2. Let AHC make a list of demands they want to see changed or put in place, propose it to CRS, let GHC review the demand and then make some sort of deal everyone is in agreement with. However, AHC should not start asking for certain weapons to be removed or nerfed in numbers...stop doing that makes you look petty and complaining about issues that wont be removed. The mg34 is not going to be taken away, so just stop complaining about it. It was an uber weapon and should be uber in game. The germans made some freaking kick [censored] weapons during this time and we are trying to play a historically accurate game. Stop [censored]ing about it and spend time and focus on changes that can help you side, not remove from the other side. 3. Maybe CRS should debate (a long debate) once again allowing the HCs to manually set their own supply list once again and having set values for each weapon with a max point total to spend. In alot of ways it removes these issues from appearing because CRS can just say...we have no control over it. The complaints would be within each side and not directed at them. Thats what I would do if i was running the show, why let my company and team take heat when I can direct it somewhere else thus allowing more control by the playerbase and HC
  6. Yea must have missed that about you and others complaining, and rightfully so...but I will just say this, these issues needs to be addressed like now, not next month or sometime soon...it should be addressed now How can they say "too difficult with tools etc." ahh that bs...AHC sends a email prior to deployment and says we want this division here in this town we hold etc etc up and down the front. Hell is so freaking important in my book due to supply, types of equipment, speed, armor, where your front is on the map...the game should just pause for 20 mins if needed to place them under AHC orders. In total shock here this is the case; because I thought AHC made the decision of what divisions are kept and where placement was and I was thinking a few hours ago removing alot of those BEF divisions on that part of map was a major mistake...mistake by CRS i guess I know now
  7. Ooooo really, wow didnt know that...now that is a bigggggly problem and if I was in AHC I would be beating my fists on the door to where servers are stored to get control of those divisions and placement How the &%$@# did you guys let this go on for so long ??? They control the placement ??? Thats like a hugggggge decision and takes many factors into play. Most factors I will keep to myself, but its a very big deal. Just one mans opinion but that is what u guys should be [censored]ing about way more than an extra 30-40 units of supply
  8. I know this is abit off-topic during a heated discussion but would like to know the answer please: When the American divisions do arrive for placement on the map, how does AHC decide what to remove and where etc.? Does AHC just remove say one BEF division in town xyz held by BEF and place an American div in its place ? Or if town held by French, AHC just removes that division and place American one there ? Thnx
  9. So you can add and or adjust during a campaign ? We were told in another thread about supply numbers it was not possible to do and now this is twice during this same campaign someone has added/adjusted them within a couple hours. But in another thread about BEF armor numbers that is weeks old and has been brought to the attention for 2-3 weeks... nothing was done not does it look like anything will be done Thats freaking BS in my book and as a paying customer for 17 years I am pretty pi$$ed off about certain things getting adjusted within hours and other issues not being addressed for weeks
  10. Yes either this or if a town is contested no moving in a new flag
  11. whatever dude, you know as well as everyone else this is an extremely long intermission...if its for a patch then great but at least alert us if so. as you said, "you can log in and fight" yea i did last night and it was worthless and meaningless so whats the point. We play and pay for campaigns not super long intermissions. This map has been over since Tuesday and the new one starts on a Sunday morning ?!? Thats freaking stupid when we all know it should start during an afternoon or evening. People want to play and not during some meaningless intermission that has less than 10 people defending ( last night when i logged on ) I dont mind intermission and its always been that way so its fine; my beef is the duration of this intermission plus the new start day & time I put forth a proposal that the winning side should make the decision on the next campaign start date and time with a 48 minimum time and 96 hour maximum time in place.
  12. Sunday morning ?? whats the reasoning behind that time compared to a Saturday night start ? We have been off since Tuesday or Wednesday...lets get this going !!
  13. Just want to give a quick shout out to all the Allied player base on the attack last night at Le Catelet... that was one heck of a battle, and one of the best nights we have had all map. Heavy EA and ET presence, and had the axis players running around all over town struggling to defend. Non-stop rushes on the bunker, massive waves of armor and had our Discord channel in fits to keep up...all the while being slightly underpop i think; so a big salute for going on the offensive, it was a great battle and excellent night of action. Just know we had a lot of yelling going on our channel to try and keep up and we all admitted it was one of the best nights of action we have had this map Hope to see more of it tonight attackers at Le Cat Friday night
  14. Yes someone did alert town defenders about it, funny you mentioned this since at the time I was thinking it was a great location for para drop because 95% of us were either north or west, so it was a great plan
  15. Actually I do not know what was going on there Merlin Our Discord channel was on the defensive pretty much all night between Le Cat & Bavay, so not sure what happened at Mons The most yelling we have had in awhile but everyone agreed one of the best nights of fun all map
  16. Oh yes I forgot to mention the para drops that was going on too so much action it was hard to remember everything, kindof of blur now since my map was filled up with red marks everywhere hehe Excellent battle and a great night of action and fun for everyone
  17. Try a 2lbr from same distance, also level ground surface and hit the sapper spot on Tiger. I would do it, but not sure how to record stuff nor have dual accounts
  18. Gore, the pak36 has to be veryyyy close to take out a Sherman, now it can take out the engine from a few hundred meters but to get the kia, it must be super close I will bet you a year subscription to ww2online that a 2lber can take out a Tiger from farther distance than pak36 vs Sherman
  19. Well you guys can paint it with any brush you want however there were adjustments, changes to cap times, and or rule changes...whatever u want to call them, but the picture remains the same...it was done mid-campaign and imho should not ever happen during a campaign. And also after reading the email i just received; the supply reinstatement for a unit kia was increased from 12 hours to 15 hours ?? I am not complaining, just trying to offer advice...do this stuff after a campaign...nor am i mad, just abit disappointed that this wasn't really even discussed with all parties ??
  20. Haha, yes it will end some day. I just think you dont make changes like this mid-campaign, nor any patches mid-campaign unless for maintenance. Just old school philosophy i guess but i have seen many patches released mid-campaign that pop up new bugs, plus you should never change the rules during a campaign. Just mho
  21. So they did make adjustments mid-campaign ? Sorry but you should never change the rules during the campaign itself, you don't do that to people
  22. "did not touch the settings..." "new Capture timers are now in place" ?? which one is it ?? Did u adjust the capture timers or not ? CRS is on the right path and dedication is there for sure...however, you should never ever make adjustments like this during a campaign Let it play out, then adjust....never do it during campaign...it really ticks people off after putting in much effort and time to see it adjusted during a campaign....dont do it
  23. "deployed by truck (player)" that tells me the build time would be short, and imho they should take hours to complete or maybe even a full day to build one. Of course no one is going to do that via a truck, so it maybe should be an HC command once HC discusses location with the air command and yes a limited number per map only, and yes 3 sounds about right Also we need to discuss are they capturable or destroyable ?
  24. The topic is worth discussing As dre21 stated in one of the earlier posts, and I agree, the bombing must hit the hanger to effect the supply pool only at the AFFMS, not static AFs, even though this should also be open to discussion However before this topic is discussed and decided upon the first few tasks that need to be ironed out is how one is built, how long does it take, can it be damaged during construction to slow completion rate/time...and finally would the AFFMS is destroyable or capturable or both ? Personally I think it should take over 24 hours to build one. Now of course we don't have to have some engineers or trucks logged in for 24 hours non-stop to built it, but it should take a serious amount of time to construct one imho I like the idea affecting the supply pool by bombing raids targeting the hangers but imho is should be the 3rd step after we iron out first step details edit: also where will the supply be pulled from ? From Brux and Twerp AF supply or will the AFFMS only be allowed for landings to resupply and take off again ? imho the only thing it should be used for is to re-supply, not to spawn from. The air war is not even at this starge by a long shot and to allow spawning closer to the front could make matters even worse if you are gonna allow spawning from a AFFMS then we should definitely be able to bomb the hangers to affect the supply pool, it would give our HE 111 pilots something to do and they are lacking with strategic missions and numbers now as it is
  25. After watching the video and looking at the minimap and seeing the distance to town, it must have taken that Sherman a good 10-15 mins to get into that position and you complain about the FMS ?!? That is a player base problem allowing to get camped like that not a problem with the FMS. You guys (and I see atleast 10 there) had plenty of time to setup. Problem is most players won't defend it and just run off and then complain when it gets camped and since no one defends it, its your own problem that u created.