csm308

Registered Users
  • Content count

    8,714
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

csm308 last won the day on April 9

csm308 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

322 Salty

About csm308

  • Rank
    Monthly Hero Builder
  • Birthday 08/16/1954

Profile Information

  • Location
    Laurel, MD
  • Preferred Side
    Axis
  • Preferred Branch
    Air Force
  • Preferred Unit
    HE-111

Recent Profile Visitors

1,073 profile views
  1. Sorry, but you're going to have to prove that statement. Saying it is so, doesn't make it so. VR
  2. My understanding is that "proximity AO's" are not ready for 1.36. Is that correct? If so, you haven't "solved" the HC problem. VR
  3. Your attempt at, ahem, "sanitization" of why the Allied HEAT grenades were removed is noted. It does not change the fact that you didn't mention it. VR
  4. My personal experience in these forums over the past 18 years says something other than what you said, will be what actually happens. VR
  5. You are, of course, forgetting why the Allied HEAT RG's were removed. The "Rambo LMG" manner they were being used. German Panzer drivers would death spiral out and see the Allied RG grenadier laying right next to the panzer, completely unharmed. VR
  6. We'll save this and all the other statements made by Allied "realists" the next time an Allied advantage gets, ahem, "fixed." Undoubtedly they'll say exactly the same thing. Won't they? Hmmmm? For sure they will say the exact same thing, Right? VR
  7. He is most assuredly another happy Allied player. VR
  8. So you want to have both. I figured as much. You want both Rambo BAR (with no Axis equivalent) and the M1919A6. Got it. VR
  9. So, the BAR goes away when the M1919A6 gets in game, right? VR
  10. And just how many FG42s are in game compared to the ubiquitous BAR? How many FG42s are on the frontline in combat at any one time compared to the BAR? You're really reaching here Jwilly. That's okay, we Axis players understand you have to justify this change. Aismov has it absolutely right though, "it is similarly disingenuous and smacks of condescension if Allied players now all of a sudden rush to the "its historical" argument and deny they have gotten the adjustment they have been asking for purely for gameplay reasons. The opposite side will see right through it." VR
  11. Um, no. The M1918A2 weighed in at 19lbs. VR
  12. Make light of it all you wish, you are expected to do so. The Axis players will remember that you did this and they won't be as altruistic about it as you wish them to be. To me this is just one more kick to the Axis groin that I am not willing to forgive and forget. VR
  13. Hmmmm, appears one is not like the other so maybe they shouldn't be lumped together. VR
  14. I have been "adapting and overcoming" for eighteen years. It becomes quite tiresome to have to keep on doing so especially with something like this that didn't have to happen and is completely capricious in nature. VR
  15. No, CS&R says you are an Allied player. If you were fifty-fifty Axis/Allied the point would be moot, but you are not. You are almost exclusively an Allied player. VR