• Announcements


      Need help for incoming players.   04/29/2017

      With the looming Steam release, we are anticipating many new players to the game. This is great for all of us, and it's important that we retain as many as we can. With that in mind, we'd like to enlist players to help with the inevitable questions asked in the forums. Ideally, gameplay questions are asked and answered in-game, but it's not always easy or convenient to answer questions while playing. A Gameplay Support Forum would be a good place for those who want to help. We are now accepting volunteers for the Rat Patrol, who will provide correct and consistent info to new players in the Forums. The more new players we retain, the better it is for the game and the biggest hurdle in player retention is grasping the complexities of this game. If you are interested, send me a PM.  
    • Dodger

      Squad Leaders Contact GVONPAUL OR Dodger for Squad Forums   05/18/2017


      We are seeking Squad Leaders to volunteer their squads to help us test the upcoming Squad Forums system. This system will integrate squads who wish to participate into a self-sustained "forum within a forum." You will be able to add members to your squad, assign permissions, and create forums/calendar events on your own. The idea behind this system is part of our commitment to support squads as a integral part of our community. This service will be offered free of charge to all squads of World War II Online upon launch. Our goal is to offer all of the services a squad off-site forum can offer but free of charge and tied in to our existing forum service. So what do you need tested? We need willing volunteers to test the whole system - make forums, post threads, assign permissions, etc. The idea is to have several squads giving it a test run to point out any flaws before we launch it publicly. What are the requirements? We are ideally looking for medium to large squads - Ideally ten people or so plus, but smaller squads feel free to apply - and a willingness to use our platform. It's important to note (as of now - these may be included at a later date) we are unable to convert posts from a private forum if your squad previously used one, and you (or your XO's and recruiters) will need to assign individual members permissions. It is entirely possible that in the future this system will be automatically linked to the game's squad roster, but as of now developer priorities are elsewhere (1.37 and steam, w00t!) How do I sign up? PM me ( @Dodger ) on the forums, or email me at dodger@playnet.com - Please indicate your squad name and how many members you have. I will get back to you with more instructions.


Registered Users
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Mosizlak last won the day on May 7

Mosizlak had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

188 Salty

About Mosizlak

  • Rank
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Preferred Side
  • Preferred Branch
  • Preferred Unit

Recent Profile Visitors

607 profile views
  1. I can't play other FPS anymore. This friggin game has ruined my FPS skills lol.
  2. Exactly. Wish I had a video of the dolphin divers. Crazy hard to hit with anything except an LMG.
  3. My apologies, I know how Mercy plays. Everyone needs some down time ingame.
  4. Yeah, cause building 50 PPOs helps defending. BS.
  5. Yup, but don't come complaining on the forums about getting rolled while you spend 9 hours making PPOs on a road somewhere haha
  6. LOL epic waste of time.
  7. And the panhard and DAC were recon vehicles, not solo tank executioners. Period. Right? LOL
  8. If it could be done, it could be done. End of discussion, unless you have biased concerns.
  9. I'm saying you can't screw over one side while leaving the other side's un-historical advantages alone. Almost EVERY weapon in the game is used in a way that it wasn't used in the war. Single sappers charging tanks? Cmon. I'm sure that happened every day lol. Single RPATs stalking tanks? Single tanks attacking a town? Etc, etc, etc. So you wanna single out the one you don't like?
  10. I'm saying you can't go around gimping 1 thing that's not being used like it was historically and leave every other thing in the game alone, which is basically everything in the game lol.
  11. No one is saying it isn't modeled correctly, what we are saying is it isn't being used correctly. (aside from the blazing speed offroad which is terrain based botched modeling) They were recon vehicles, not tank destroyers. They were not solo panzer executioners. That's the way they are being used in this game. Same argument with the MG34. I doubt it was used very much at all in real life like it's used in this game, but what are you gonna do? Gimp one while leaving everything else untouched in this game that is used differently than it was used in the war?
  12. So the terrain isn't modeled correctly, which allows wheeled vehicles to travel at speeds offroad that would be impossible. You're pretty much splitting hairs here, because the end result is the same: Stuff isn't realistic.
  13. So you think a guy couldn't fire an Mg34 like that? Even in an emergency?
  14. Exactly, so you can't go around changing one piece because you don't like it.
  15. You can't just apply the realism thing to the one thing you don't like. Re-read my other post. You wanna do away with rambo LMGs? Well we wanna do away with DACs and pans slaughtering axis armor, acting like Rambo tank executioners when they were recon vehicles that were supposed to avoid combat.