Registered Users
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

65 Vet

About xohorvath

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Preferred Side
  • Preferred Branch
  • Preferred Unit
    River Boat

Recent Profile Visitors

1,051 profile views
  1. Why shouldn't a defender have an elevated position to snipe from? I think depot snipers are relatively useless-however, having the high ground defensively is obviously important. Perhaps the flag should change colors when the attacker looks at the flag.
  2. Use already existing building designs for the FMS. Similar to a FB but as an FMS. Obviously large in size, but offers a bit more protection. Or, those broken down building we see scattered in various towns. Not necessarily realistic, but goes well with the idea that it would give the grass hunters something to defend and fortify more so than a box.
  3. Correct. Been saying this for how long?
  4. I dunno, Friday had some strong CQB all day.
  5. I do not share such confidence. In a conversation I asked whether the supply 'concerns' would be addressed and the answer was that this limited supply decision to ease us into 1.36. Expect the trend to continue. As the supply trends downward, so does the support.
  6. The 'historical spawnlist' is in its second, third? campaign? Using only this campaign as a barometer is myopic. Regardless, you also have to consider who is doing what and how. Players who hide in buildings or are out in the middle of nowhere NOT engaged in CQB have little room to talk about automatic supply/armor supply as they aren't actually impacted all that much. Why would a player who primarily plays as a rifle, care about no automatics, or how those automatics work? They don't. You think Nily cares that the only supply is a rifle? You think he's concerned about getting rushed with automatics while he snipes clueless players with his rifle from a distance? I see a lot of individuals, from the new players to the super extreme vets with large letters who are rarely, if at all in CQ infantry battles in ABs, or CPs, or smaller towns. It's easy to make these comments when you aren't directly impacted by them on a day to day, sortie to sortie basis.
  7. How do we consistently, campaign after campaign, miss those that are only in the cps and fbs defending? Taking out EMS, etc. And then, when an axis player comes over, they are quickly given an award. I just laugh now. Await the sympathy award for next campaign. Should be paying attention to the other players who bust their butts off, every day in the cps, defending fbs and busting tanks who aren't friends.
  8. lol nice! <s< I see you kase <s<
  9. <s< Kyotee and ian
  10. Gentlemen, <s> appreciate the shout out and kind words, piska! See you on the battlefield! <s>
  11. Missed few: S\ Xohorvath S\Blakeh S\Snappled S\Slakbladdr
  12. Every campaign.
  13. ya, and if you don't fight in the cps or bunkers consistently, or at all, and play with rifles anyway, why would anyone else care? Does anyone really think nily or other players who don't fight in the cps for the most part care about the limited automatics? Of course not. Thus, it's easy to cite, 'historical supply.'
  14. I have NEVER heard any veteran player realistically ask for UNLIMITED supply as one would find in intermission. I can see noobs looking for it, but certainly not vets. I know of only one hc player who has said, "too many automatics." I suspect that was to make it easier for people to cap who can't otherwise compete. Wish granted. As if it wasn't easy enough with rambo lmgs/smgs, it's significantly easier now. No one is asking for "unlimited supply." We want to be able to play the game. Effectively play the game. And not have to throw helmets at our lagging, ramboing opponents. That seems like a reasonable request when you specifically PAY to use automatics. WE were told, that the limited supply decision was YOUR decision to help us adjust to the 1.36 hybrid system. I took that to mean, and was not corrected, that [censored] poor smg/auto supply was going to continue into 1.36. I was not corrected.