goreblimey

Registered Users
  • Content count

    554
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

goreblimey last won the day on June 21 2018

goreblimey had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

199 Salty

About goreblimey

Profile Information

  • Preferred Side
    Allied
  • Preferred Branch
    Navy
  • Preferred Unit
    River Boat

Recent Profile Visitors

1,063 profile views
  1. I get it your model isn't FTP. It's gimme gimme gimme someone else pay so I can play. I'll grant you this game is too expensive for what it offers the casual gamer though. You can buy 6 titles for your yearly subscription to this game. I play a lot , I get value for what I play, if I played a lot less I'm not sure I would see value in what is being offered. That I believe is where the subscription system fails. It almost demands that I play constantly to justify the cost. I can see theyre trying but, retreating from a subscription model without other means of monetisation is probably seen as high risk and one that is almost irreversible if proven a wrong step. Let's not forget CRS is not the organ grinder , just the monkey.
  2. Sure if we apply scaling to the early Brits , as per later tiers for the germans maybe that works out. Who knows. I dont think they are doing themselves any favours trying to surprise us with TOE changes. Pre Publish the info , cant be that hard to do.
  3. I disagree the current allocation of infantry tanks implies there are enough for every infantry brigade to have good infantry tank support at all times... cant see that in 1940 sorry. 2 Regiment of Infantry tanks does not spread amongst 10 divisions, At present the Matilda II is over represented compared to its historical deployment in the Battle of France. That may have changed if France did not fall who knows.. How the game designers choose to balance the game is their issue , just lets be honest.
  4. I understand that for games sake, that rational can be followed ie HQ troops allocated to inf formations, however you cant allocate the same HQ troops to 4 different locations at the same time
  5. riflemen should have zero access to anti armour weapons. Dont care about the feelings of FTP players who [censored] about P2Win. Look at some of the top players stats with rifles - off the top of my head Mobius57 Kool sydspain, they achieved top killers/cappers in game on FTP accounts. The whole rank/grind is not based around FTP - . Heres how ur other games go -- PAY and your experience is quadrupled , with a much longer grind for equipment. we dont have enough levels of equipment for this imo.
  6. Nor wishing for a nerf on the brits , however. The whole setup of Brit divisions is wrong No Brit units have HVY Arm intrinsic to basically an INF Division . They may be called infantry Tanks but they're not permanently assigned to Infantry Divisions. BEF only had Inf Tanks As part of the GHQ Corps Troops. I realise we have what we have but most of this TOE is fantasy for all sides.
  7. was waiting for the [censored]ing(complaining) apparently b i t c h i n g isnt a word ?? to start....just as well the seal clubbers are taking towns for giggles. Otherwise ya looks dodgy to me. If we had balanced numbers the spawn list would be causing problem methinks
  8. Those sights need moving to the 17lber atg , just to keep it historical.
  9. Lol 4 divisions of brits is 16 fireflies not what I’d call a lot. A lot is 10 divisions worth of tigers with 25 in each division that we used to have. I call 250 a lot.
  10. Sounds dangerously close to racial superiority.....
  11. BEF was upped to 2 Divs after the server outage
  12. The point being made is that there is only 1 brit division on the map. You lot made a song and dance about it and then removed the divisions from the game. Brilliant move.
  13. Bmbm. That answer just hits the spot.....i'm going to remain polite.