Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
memnoch

HERE FPS HERE BOY

71 posts in this topic

So you're spending money on a buggy game so you can quiz me to win an argument in a forum?

If you know exactly what it is, then why are you asking me?

E-mail CRS and tell them what it is and how to fix it if you think you know better than them.

I still find it a little funny that you were talking about preferring to "empty your wallet on your family", yet you're still choosing to invest in this game and do nothing constructive other than complain.

The game absolutely has bugs, shortcomings, and major problems. If you feel it worth your time, e-mail CRS and let them know what you've found out.

Huh?

Once again....huh?

If you think yesterday's PCs could achieve solid frames, then why don't you sell your PC and buy something older on ebay?

Look, I understand your complaints about the game.

But since you choose to spend money on it, you should realize that your nonconstructive criticisms don't help the game that you invested in.

Well we all knew you don't have the answers to everything since there are alot of different systems and such forth. I'm asking you since you are attempting to help solve other peoples issues by the guides you place in the forums. In reality it does help some. What's bothersome right now for many of us we won't log into the game simply because it's not functional for us to use. Time is ticking bye, and so are our subscriptions. And so is our money. While 14 bucks isn't much to some, its alot for others. Toss in a grand to upgrade to another system that in the end won't make much of a difference in the end anyway, you're talking crazy. I know what the problems are, Gophur knows about them. CRS knows about them. They are valid issues in programming code. Which I'm 100% positive they are trying to fix. Afterall when they look at the server population they can see there isn't that much action which probably concerns them.

I can complain if I want to because I have every right to do so while they work on it. I am the customer, I am paying. And yes I will still argue yesterdays PC should get solid frames with this ancient graphics engine. If you don't know what we mean, go download a steam client and play some demos. Take HL2 for example, a well known program used for gaming benchmarks. Load it up and you'll find way more detail, textures, and graphics that will blow wwiionline away. Most people with much older machines in here will see 30-40 fps in it, load it up with a moderately new system from the last year or two 100+. Load it up with today's bleeding edge machines 200 easy. OKAY now load up wwiionline...6 fps for everyone LMAO, unless of course you've got that just perfect combo that works, or maybe one that requires some tweaking but runs great.

It was funny last night, some guys that haven't played for a long time came back to see what all the hype was about. "MORTARS!!!111" are finally ingame after 6 long years. We were sitting there on our teamspeak talking why we tried to play. There was about 20 of us shoot'n the breeze, some people we haven't seen for 2-3 years coming back to check it out and after about 15 or so minutes we were down to 10. People logging in disgust. People with top of the line quad procs Q6600's oc'd to 3.6 gigs getting single digits, Athlon 64x2's with 8800gts's and gtx's getting single digits when looking at towns. The problem very obvious. Soon were down to 3-4 people and they one guy getting kick arse FPS with no problems whatsoever, a P4 at 2 ghz and a nvdia 6600. Go figure...

Do all the tips and tweaks you want, but it's not going to erase all the various problems out there that came with the last patch or two. Frustrating yes. But times a tick'n.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Xl2rippr, you're mostly comparing apples with oranges here which should be obvious for you by now if you read what Xanthus told you. I've been playing the game since early 2002 with high-end computers soly, gone through 3 so far with a cost at least of $5000 each so I very well know what you can expect from this game.

Simply put there are nothing more demanding than this game which put your hardware obsolete much faster compared with other games, granted you're playing at the higher resolutions and settings which I did.

To compare shoe box games as Doom, Half-Life and the so much hated Battlefield series to WWIIOL is nothing but an insult, and proves you totally ignored what Xanthus told you, and further on shows you've never read any of Doc's posts.

What I more than happily can give you is that the major problem this game has and CRS indirectly, is the very small size of the resources they have compared to other online based games. This basically puts us in the seat we're now in, yet we have still are being able to play this great product after so many years since it first launched.

As always many people experience problems after a major update and this should be taken into consideration before you post. It sucks a lot of course, but you get nothing in return when you start bashing the entire game as a no good for anything example.

The Rats will sort it out and everything will get back to normal.

Trust me on that.

Aboleo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sad to say but there must be something wrong with your systems and/or setups

there was nothing wrong with my system before the patch. I went from about 40-50 fps last map down to 6-25fps now as well. Reinstalled my vid, sound drivers. Completely removed game by uninstalling, deleting the crs and playnet folders and registry entries. Reinstalled, no luck. any big battle near the town, i drop down to like 8fps. No idea whats going on, but have unsubbed once again because i cant play the game.

i have amd 64bit 4300

6800GT OC

gig of ram

xp sp2

16mbit/2mbit cable

so i may be due for an upgrade i guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there was nothing wrong with my system before the patch. I went from about 40-50 fps last map down to 6-25fps now as well. Reinstalled my vid, sound drivers. Completely removed game by uninstalling, deleting the crs and playnet folders and registry entries. Reinstalled, no luck. any big battle near the town, i drop down to like 8fps. No idea whats going on, but have unsubbed once again because i cant play the game.

i have amd 64bit 4300

6800GT OC

gig of ram

xp sp2

16mbit/2mbit cable

so i may be due for an upgrade i guess.

1 GB ram?

Add one more and it will make a huge difference. I run a slimmed down windows that uses 120 MB when booted up. When the game with everything is up and running just about 1 GB is used. So, you can imagine that it will require more than 1 GB if you just run a stock standard windows and it will start swapping. With 2 GB it doesn't and that makes a lot of difference.

Your CPU might be overclockable a bit so you might try that. I don't know how much difference performance wise it is between your gfx card and my X850 but they are the same generation so it should be similar and I have decent performance. Difference is I have 2 gigs and a 64 X2 5200+ cpu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Xanthus, You pretty much fail at everything here.

Before this patch running an 8800gt and a duel core, system 4 gigs of ram fps was like 25 for alot of people, yet on my old x800 pro athlon 64 3200, 2 gigs of ram, I was getting 100fps, How is that right? I Also notice your screens are never looking into a town Nor are you flying over a town say Roosendal when under heavy attack, Any one can go to a beta server with 5-6 people and show 120 fps there try it in the real game server, In a town in real combat.

The fact that you are even posting in this forum shows how much of an idiot you are, If you are not having issues FCuk off, this forum is for those having problem not for you to post beta screens showing that you looking away from town views are good, As seen below so stop posting your one sided views.

first one off line looking up nice fps ooohhhh...

SShot75.jpg

Second is live server current while not near towns in combat. 51 not bad.

SShot53.jpg

The last is the same mission just trying to land at at antwerp not under attack and no AAA going off just simply facing the town is retarded.

SShot54.jpg

So xanthus you can post your dumbA$$ screens all you want but we are saying there are issues Instead of posting that there nothing wrong and it's all our systems how about taking a nice dose of STFU, and letting someone else reply that might have some sort of idea what might help, If you offer nothing dont reply go troll elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dual Core E6400 OC'd to 3.2 GHZ

2 gigs of Patriot DDR2- 800

7900 GS

ABIT IP-35E

Did a fresh install of the game and XP

FPS are in the 100's

I dont fly so can't say anything about flying over towns.

Last night in Breda(I think everyone was there) I was getting FPS no less than 40 any where I went.

I also have Player vis set to high

Hope I don't jinx myself

Morale is, you dont need the top of the line equipment to run the game

Some combos get it,some dont..

BTW I dont use my gaming PC for porn-surfing:D :D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Before this patch running an 8800gt and a duel core, system 4 gigs of ram fps was like 25 for alot of people, yet on my old x800 pro athlon 64 3200, 2 gigs of ram, I was getting 100fps, How is that right? ...

...So xanthus you can post your dumbA$$ screens all you want but we are saying there are issues Instead of posting that there nothing wrong and it's all our systems how about taking a nice dose of STFU, and letting someone else reply that might have some sort of idea what might help, If you offer nothing dont reply go troll elsewhere.

QFT

I run the 8800gts (OC'd), 2.4ghz C2D, with quality components.

In 1.26 I achieved a very constant 80-150FPS anywhere and everywhere. I can still achieve those frames, but over towns and especially active towns, my frames can drop into the teens.

There is an issue that many players have alluded too. There has not been a definitive response, but we assume that CRS is aware and trying their best.

It would be nice to receive official acknowledgement with a RAT sponsored thread attempting to be a knowledgebase for logs and tests, but the lack of communication means more complaints and threads.

Your theory on outdated systems and up-to-date code is entirely misguided, relevant to a degree, but never-the-less misguided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would be nice to receive official acknowledgement with a RAT sponsored thread attempting to be a knowledgebase for logs and tests' date=' but the lack of communication means more complaints and threads.[/quote']

QFT

Exactly what we need.

lets try catch one

22846868.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Add one more and it will make a huge difference.

ill add it when i build my next box. I was just posting here to let others know i saw the same issue. Obviuosly the patch caused some fps issues for some of us. Halo3's coming out, i wont be playing much on the pc until i build a new box anyways. Good luck to the guys with issues.

S!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @ all

just my 5 cents

Low fps hit me real hard that patch.

AMD X2 4600+, 2 Gig, 7800 GT

Air: Start with 90+, fly to target with 60-90, patrol over target with 40-60 (drops to 15 looking down), but following a diving ea to target below 2k results to one frame each 3 seconds(!). *If* i survive that, the frames will raise again, but not to more than 25... in some (most) cases it'll stay like that until i land on my "origin" AF (the spot, where i had 90+ at start), while the situation there (numbers etc.) is comparable.

That's pretty strange and i don't believe it's a system dependend issue.

1) In earlier versions some workarounds existed, like tweaking nViddrivers or setting the _sse.exe to use one core only and stuff like that. But none of them help me now, e.g. the 1.27_sse.exe is allready SET by default to use one core only; i just swap from 0 to 1 right now.

2) My settings use ~1.55 GB at max, currently; since there are 2 Gb phys and additional 2 Gb virt, this does not cause any problems... except SmartHeap dies all off sudden, which it didn't since i started to run the mem-measurement in background last Tuesday.

3) I tried some of the new hints, like dis- or enabling the frame run ahead, trying some shadow settings, but believe it or not: it does not change much. Unfortunately.

The "pattern" of the problem seems to stay the same: consumate something and stiff my graphic/memory with unfreed blocks until the exe dies and/or i leave the area.

It would be nice if the QA teams just would publish their settings (complete!)... for testing purposes. I'm tired of switching on/off something, fly 10 minutes and die by lag-attack over a town - and i still wonder, what FOV/LOD changes, Dithering and things like that could do if they are used properly in the one "top-secret" combination of switches that might work. :)

Nice trap, xen. But u rather should put some dollars in it and eat the cheese yourself. Word is that seems to work better :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is this mainly AMD systems that are having fps probs with 1.27?

Intel C2D here and its happening. I can confirm several others with Intels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me it seems that it's mainly nvidia users that has problems, especially those with DX10 cards. I haven't seen many with ATI cards, unless they have very old ones, report extremely low FPS.

Looking through all posts it seems that it's the people with C2D AND GF8800's that have the worst issues.

Not a very scientifical research but that's what it looks like reading through the posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been putting together some appearantly very nice hardware for my upcoming computer, including a Nvidia 8800 GTX. Now last card I owned was a 7900 GTX which performed very good, so you could expect nothing but the same from the latest and greatest series from Nvidia right?

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=41351

It seems Nvidia was a tad to eager to win market shares and that to a appearantly high prize. By simply searching for "Nvidia 8800 issues", Vista excluded of course, you get hours upon hours of enjoyable reading from everything from major slowdowns to frequent blue screens.

As I said folks, WWIIOL sure is demanding and after major patches sometimes highly unstable, which will be fixed, but it's clear CRS isn't the culprit here.

Aboleo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've been putting together some appearantly very nice hardware for my upcoming computer, including a Nvidia 8800 GTX. Now last card I owned was a 7900 GTX which performed very good, so you could expect nothing but the same from the latest and greatest series from Nvidia right?

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=41351

It seems Nvidia was a tad to eager to win market shares and that to a appearantly high prize. By simply searching for "Nvidia 8800 issues", Vista excluded of course, you get hours upon hours of enjoyable reading from everything from major slowdowns to frequent blue screens.

As I said folks, WWIIOL sure is demanding and after major patches sometimes highly unstable, which will be fixed, but it's clear CRS isn't the culprit here.

Aboleo

First, lets look at it using some deductive reasoning...

--I currently have issues with stuttering and I have a C2D and 8800GTS (utilizing 162.18 drivers).

--Prior to patch, all was well with the world on all games I play.

--Post patch, NO CHANGE IN ANY HARDWARE OR DRIVERS, we have issues.

... so lifting the responsibility from CRS completely, is not wise.

Furthermore, that "news" source you are using is highly suspect. Not a lot of source citing or solid evidence they talked to anyone at NVidia.

Show me a reputable site and some reference to an employee (other than the janitor) at NVidia and I'll help you crucify em...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In your case Ma it's most likely the new patch soly that's the culprit no doubt about that. I also used to have problems after a patch got released, personally I basically had CTHL problems which were solved after a while when CRS located the problem.

Moreover I were simply addressing the people which were having slowdowns. Just as CRS and WWIIOL isn't 100% perfect, you can say the same regarding Nvidia and every other hardware manufactor, that's the hard truth I'm afraid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In your case Ma it's most likely the new patch soly that's the culprit no doubt about that. I also used to have problems after a patch got released, personally I basically had CTHL problems which were solved after a while when CRS located the problem.

Moreover I were simply addressing the people which were having slowdowns. Just as CRS and WWIIOL isn't 100% perfect, you can say the same regarding Nvidia and every other hardware manufactor, that's the hard truth I'm afraid.

I'm not dismissing your claim there may be a problem with the vid cards. But, as a hypothetical, if CRS had not released a new patch last week we would not be suffering these problems. On the same note, you would not see a multitude of posts about the issues from so many users.

I'm certain CRS is working to resolve the issues as something in the new patch has become an immediate suspect.

They may later find it relates back to NVidia Vid card users, running WinXP on Intel C2D machines while eating chocolate doughnuts with white frosting whose red sprinkles were manufactured in a Chinese lead paint factory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have intel core2 quad Q6600 ,2g ram,geforce 8800gts and asus p5k motherboard.I have my fps going in the 18-20 in some place .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, running duel monitors?

In nvidia control panel, 3d settings, Multi-display/mixed-gpu acelleration, set to what?

If not set to single display preformance mode then perhaps give that a try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yaya critical fps decrease ..

as a newcommer,it s hard to enjoy WWII...try to fight in town with only a rifle and less than 10fps...

10 days ago,during intermission, i ve joined the big battle in "Antwerp"

i don t remember having experienced so low fps..i don t know ><

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to all sides here i have been told that Nvidia is the way to go when it comes to this game. yet again when i am seeing on hc channel i see more then like 4 to 6 players returning from a ctd more then once i ask my self how can Nvidia be the way to go?

now i have a ATI X800 AGP card i only ctd every once in a great while all other times i can stay in game as long as i want with out haveing to worry about something. now when it comes to big battles i have a 50/50 % chance of ctding or haveing very very low fps but other then that not to many problems other then the part of haveing low fps.

now i am not saying my card is art uber by no means can it be at the top of the line like the rest of you guys art uber systems but i am saying it still hangs in there pretty well. i just hope that once crs founds out what is causing the low fps and i do agree with some that has already said in this subject.

in time once the rats find the problem and fixes it hopefully the fps we all are use to seeing from our systems will return if not i will say this much right now going to need some more ram and a better card. start of with something at the basic level and then work on the problem take it one or 2 things at a time.

i do agree the low fps is annoying to me but not a whole lot we can do atm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stutter issues: are not limited to AMD, Intel, Nvidia, ATI.. Its across the board.

Lack of an official responce is causing all this speculation.

You only have to pay attaention to in-game chat to realise how many people are actually affect by this. Most people can't be bothered reporting the issue here (possible due to lack of feedback?) & are simply waiting for a fix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

core2duo 2gigs ddr800 ATI x1950pro 512. I run nearly identical to before the patch. Performance went up slightly in most areas. 200-60 fps outside of town. Big battles in towns I get 60-low 30's. It's still totally playable. It's not a huge amount different performance wise since the patch.

Has anyone had the stutter/fps issue people are speaking of with an ATI card?

Nvidia had some issues with their drivers. Something about some error running the cards out of vram. They were supposed to fix it by September. There was a post about it in the support forums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.