• Announcements

    • HEAVY265

      Hells Gate   03/24/2019

      Break through the lines, and enter Hells Gate!!! This will be the next CRS organized event.  Lead by the High command from each side.
      Free Premium Access for the event
      Date: 3/30/19 Time: 11:00 AM Server time/ 12:00pm EST/ 1600 GMT
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Teke

General George S. Patton was assassinated

8 posts in this topic

General George S. Patton was assassinated to silence his criticism of allied war leaders claims new book

George S. Patton, America's greatest combat general of the Second World War, was assassinated after the conflict with the connivance of US leaders, according to a new book.

By Tim Shipman in Washington

Last Updated: 5:09PM GMT 21 Dec 2008

General-George-Pat_1209908c.jpg 'We've got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he's out of control and we must save him from himself'. The OSS head General did not trust Patton

The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.

The death of General Patton in December 1945, is one of the enduring mysteries of the war era. Although he had suffered serious injuries in a car crash in Manheim, he was thought to be recovering and was on the verge of flying home.

But after a decade-long investigation, military historian Robert Wilcox claims that OSS head General "Wild Bill" Donovan ordered a highly decorated marksman called Douglas Bazata to silence Patton, who gloried in the nickname "Old Blood and Guts".

His book, "Target Patton", contains interviews with Mr Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton's Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.

Mr Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general.

Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph that when he spoke to Mr Bazata: "He was struggling with himself, all these killings he had done. He confessed to me that he had caused the accident, that he was ordered to do so by Wild Bill Donovan.

"Donovan told him: 'We've got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he's out of control and we must save him from himself and from ruining everything the allies have done.' I believe Douglas Bazata. He's a sterling guy."

Mr Bazata led an extraordinary life. He was a member of the Jedburghs, the elite unit who parachuted into France to help organise the Resistance in the run up to D-Day in 1944. He earned four purple hearts, a Distinguished Service Cross and the French Croix de Guerre three times over for his efforts.

After the war he became a celebrated artist who enjoyed the patronage of Princess Grace of Monaco and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

He was friends with Salvador Dali, who painted a portrait of Bazata as Don Quixote.

He ended his career as an aide to President Ronald Reagan's Navy Secretary John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 Commission and adviser to John McCain's presidential campaign.

Mr Wilcox also tracked down and interviewed Stephen Skubik, an officer in the Counter-Intelligence Corps of the US Army, who said he learnt that Patton was on Stalin's death list. Skubik repeatedly alerted Donovan, who simply had him sent back to the US.

"You have two strong witnesses here," Mr Wilcox said. "The evidence is that the Russians finished the job."

The scenario sounds far fetched but Mr Wilcox has assembled a compelling case that US officials had something to hide. At least five documents relating to the car accident have been removed from US archives.

The driver of the truck was whisked away to London before he could be questioned and no autopsy was performed on Patton's body.

With the help of a Cadillac expert from Detroit, Mr Wilcox has proved that the car on display in the Patton museum at Fort Knox is not the one Patton was driving.

"That is a cover-up," Mr Wilcox said.

George Patton, a dynamic controversialist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.

But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton's petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.

Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.

In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.

Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph: "Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts.

"He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.

I don't think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say." Mr Wilcox added: "I think there's enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction."

Charles Province, President of the George S. Patton Historical Society, said he hopes the book will lead to definitive proof of the plot being uncovered. He said: "There were a lot of people who were pretty damn glad that Patton died. He was going to really open the door on a lot of things that they screwed up over there."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting.

Makes you wonder though if he's just connecting the dots in the wrong order? Sure, Patton was hated by a lot of people, and yes he wanted to start a war with the USSR, but wouldn't firing him achieve the same thing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*shrug*

Patton was overrated. He was the Stalin of the Allied side. The lives of his men were expendable, so long as he got his name in the history books.

Much like General Mark 'Lookitme, I'm teh king of Rome!' Clark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
*shrug*

Patton was overrated. He was the Stalin of the Allied side. The lives of his men were expendable, so long as he got his name in the history books.

Much like General Mark 'Lookitme, I'm teh king of Rome!' Clark.

Yes Mark Clarks capture of Rome on 5th June 1944 can go down as on of the great missed opportunities of ww2. If he had done as it was suggested and cut off the retreating Germans then the war in Italy would have been a lot easier than it was for that last 11 months. The irony of course was his story was lost in the wave of news about D-Day leaving the fall of Rome as a foot note in the ww2 story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to start a thread in this department of the forums some time ago; about the best general in history.

Surprisingly many voted Patton as the one; some were not joking.

Sid Meyer's "Civilization" in its early version featured Stalin as the Leader of the Russians by default, later replaced with Katherine the Great.

I see a trend.

I read Omar Bradley's book some time ago. He was very soft about Patton. Dead man's privilege to be spoken about positively or not at all. I better support that rule now; as long as the others do the dirty job critisizing the idol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes Mark Clarks capture of Rome on 5th June 1944 can go down as on of the great missed opportunities of ww2. If he had done as it was suggested and cut off the retreating Germans then the war in Italy would have been a lot easier than it was for that last 11 months.

That's an understatement.

If they had cut off the German forces, it is entirely possible that the forces in Italy might have been able to enter Germany from the south long before the Russians even approached the border.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's an understatement.

If they had cut off the German forces, it is entirely possible that the forces in Italy might have been able to enter Germany from the south long before the Russians even approached the border.

The germans demostrated a lot of art to build a front out of nothing in that war. Belarus'44, Don'43, Oder'45, Phine river'44 as well.

One more reason, some historians noted what the allies tried their best to avoid any serious risk in Italy since Anzio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The germans demostrated a lot of art to build a front out of nothing in that war. Belarus'44' date=' Don'43, Oder'45, Phine river'44 as well.[/quote']

True, and I don't believe that they could have actually punched through into Germany, but they could have dramatically increased the pressure, and freed up a lot of forces and materials for the Western Theatre and possibly ended the war in 1944.

One more reason' date=' some historians noted what the allies tried their best to avoid any serious risk in Italy since Anzio.[/quote']

Sweet mother of god, what a cluster **** that was. "How to Misinterpret Orders and **** UP an Invasion" by Mjr Gen J.P. Lucas, rtd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.