Jump to content
Welcome to the virtual battlefield, Guest!

World War II Online is a Massively Multiplayer Online First Person Shooter based in Western Europe between 1939 and 1943. Through land, sea, and air combat using a ultra-realistic game engine, combined with a strategic layer, in the largest game world ever created - We offer the best WWII simulation experience around.

Barrels collider


haubitsi
 Share

Recommended Posts

Find out this when we were testing stuff on the training server: http://www.youtube.com/user/spunkonion#p/u/4/h-nEXoewYwU

As you can see barrels don't collide with tanks (or with any objects at all), we can see a fancy result of it.

This needz some fixing, eh? I really don't wanna see samle34s mating with the Tigers on the live server...

(Thank you timc for recording these vids).

Edited by haubitsi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was happening was 2 things.

A) Guns, such as the cmle were able to move right up to the tank, then deploy. The end of the cmle's gun barrel was then inside the tank and the tank woudl be destroyed in 1-2 shots.

B) A tank could roll right up to the side of the enemy tank, turn his turret so his gun barel is inside the other tank and then fire, bypassing the enemy tanks armour.

We didn't find any victim this didn't work on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe there is a new issue here.

It is not, would this be considered a TOS violation under "clipping", hopefully it would be enforced as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey we'd love to hit every single "wtf" thing in the game and eliminate all of them.

However, with so few guys it's not going to happen, so we prioritze based on urgency.

Getting a CaMle.38 to within clipping distance (ie: right next to it) of a Tiger tank (or any enemy tank) in an actual battle in the game world during a campaign, is so unlikely to actually happen (be possible under normal circumstances) that it naturally assumes a low priority.

There are things that we have to fix that are way further up the front of the queue than this is. That doesn't mean it isn't a valid complaint and something we don't want to fix. It just means it is way down the list if, like us, you find yourself with a list 10 times larger than the workforce you have to process that list with.

Ne c'est pas ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...