bazooka sidearm and m1 garand numbers, and paratroops

[kingnoah]

soldiers in ww2 carrying the bazooka had the m1 carbine as a sidearm. since the bazooka right now has no sidearm, the carbine ought to become it's sidearm

also, there ought to be more american assualt riflemen, then riflemen, as soldiers were only given springfields when there were no m1 garands availible.

finally, when american airborne are introduced, a good number need to have the m1 carbine since many paratroopers favored it over the m1 garand, as it was lighter, held more bullets, and some had a foldable metal wire stock

I hope you take this into consideration

[fxmmauser]

Where there even springfields expect for snipers on d day?

I also felt the need for the m1 carbine sappers, should have it instead of m1 garand.

I say all rifleman should have M1 Garand and I'm an axis player.

Edited August 7, 2011 by fxmmauser

[wetspot]

finally, when american airborne are introduced, a good number need to have the m1 carbine since many paratroopers favored it over the m1 garand, as it was lighter, held more bullets, and some had a foldable metal wire stock

I hope you take this into consideration

soldiers dont get to pick their weapons in real life.

Where there even springfields expect for snipers on d day?

I also felt the need for the m1 carbine sappers, should have it instead of m1 garand.

I say all rifleman should have M1 Garand and I'm an axis player.

no, there were no 1903s for regular guys in d day.

[kingnoah]

no, soldiers weren't able to pick which weapons they were issued, but when they could, they would get an m1 carbine. so if one was dropped on the field by a dead man, for example

[megoblks]

If zooks and shreks get rifles, it will be even worse than when sappers had them. (that is, they'll be out of the spawn in the first 10 seconds of battle). Why just have a rifle when you can have a rifle and AT?