some remarks to us sights

[doch]

I have tested the US sights, and found the following issues, which should be looked into:

- US rifle sight - the peephole ring is too wide compared top the hole. The hole itself is ok, and not too small, while not too large either, but the ring is unnecessary thick/wide, and obstructs leading in some sitations. It also reduces SA while in zoom in mode too much. The ring should imho be made thinner- like the brit rifle, which is ok.

- US thomson SMG is very bad- peephole sight way too small, ring too thick. Almost impossible to lead, even at close range, loosing targets at 20m running around. I know its an smg, still, you should be able to use the zoom in mode effectively, like on the other smgs. Need a wider peephole and thinner ring. The brit thomson as also bad, but not quite as bad as this one. Should be looked at- very annoying.

Other then that, the new infantry weapon sights seems very nice, especially the BAR is pure delight with the open sight.

Edited November 10, 2011 by doch

[ezrelay]

Might be gettin a bit picky here...but the only thing that seemed to bother me a bit, was the rear sight on the Springfield.

The Garand had the rear sight thickness reduced. Was wondering if this could also be applied to the Springfields rear sight as well. A bit tough leading long range targets.

Posted this earlier. Hopefully it will get changed.