Jump to content
Welcome to the virtual battlefield, Guest!

World War II Online is a Massively Multiplayer Online First Person Shooter based in Western Europe between 1939 and 1943. Through land, sea, and air combat using a ultra-realistic game engine, combined with a strategic layer, in the largest game world ever created - We offer the best WWII simulation experience around.

1.34.current fb damage


rote13
 Share

Recommended Posts

sshot27l.jpg

apparently something changed with the versions, with only one satchel the fbs currently will take 13% (rounded) damage, not the exact 1/8th or 12,5%

like it was previous. the veh tents and the inf spawn on this particularly fb are so close, that i was able to destroy mentioned fb with eight satchels on

the inf tents only (already .reported ingame).

so long slpr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because we changed them to take joules damage so that the HE satchel would work. Previously they took a specific damge beacuse with the HEAT function actually not doing anything to a tent, we could have a line that faked it.

Now they just take joules. Maybe a whole lot, yes ... but there is no special function (HEAT) on which to hang a special event like there used to be. I little variation isn't nessesarily a bad thing. As a simulation, it is actually the way it SHOULD be, only as a game should anything happen exactly the same way every time.

Simulations should pretty much never do that. It's a conumdrum isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well then we could call this intended and just throw this thread away or leave it, for the others to have a laugh about.

so long slpr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nah, its a valid report just not a bug, call it "unintended consequences of changing stuff" ... I wanted you to understand why it is different not to mock you or anything; you may be able to use that understanding in other areas of the game you come across

it's all good, in theory players want everything to be always the same, and there is strong reasoning to do that, at the same time, in a simulation (if you like that kind of thing) variety in results is mandatory or it isn't a simulation of anything

its a riddle, wrapped in a conumdrum, masquerading as an enigma

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...