2 AB discrepancies - German armor.

[delems]

Based on the 1.5x supply of 2 AB vrs 1 AB, the following seem off:

IIC has 5, should have 2.

IIIB has 2, should have 5.

IVD has 4, should have 3.

232 has 10, should have 11.

IVG has 9, should have 11

IIIG has 11, should have 12.

DLC IIC has 8, should have 6.

DLC IIIF has 8, should have 6.

IIIL has 4, should have 3.

Pz Jg 1 has 3, should have 5.

[Kilemall]

Same thing.  1AB then 2AB supply numbers.

I also don't know if that is x1.5 round up or down.

[delems]

*** I also don't know if that is x1.5 round up or down.

From everything I've seen, it rounds up.

[B2K]

Your fatal assumption is that the #'s in supply are a multiple of 1AB.  

[delems]

*** Your fatal assumption is that the #'s in supply are a multiple of 1AB.  

In the design criteria of garrisons, wasn't that defined?

Supply would be x for 1 AB, 1.5x for 2 ABs and 2x for 3 ABs or more?

I'll see if I can look it up.

[Mosizlak]

On 7/1/2021 at 9:02 AM, B2K said:

Your fatal assumption is that the #'s in supply are a multiple of 1AB.  

Then why not tell us what the #s are supposed to be?

Are they correct? Are they incorrect? 

That would work better than a snarky remark. 

[B2K]

7 hours ago, Mosizlak said:

Then why not tell us what the #s are supposed to be?

Are they correct? Are they incorrect? 

That would work better than a snarky remark. 

We used to (somewhere floating around here are old threads by ohm with the to&e listings), the end result was exactly the same.  

[goreblimey]

Nagging , Whiney it may be, but without constant questioning , the TOE  would not be as fixed as it currently is. 

Whatever either side thinks of the balance of those lists aside, our monitoring of the numbers has been key to keeping some semblance of order.

If the constant audit by the players is unwanted, Fix your systems.......

[B2K]

27 minutes ago, goreblimey said:

Nagging , Whiney it may be, but without constant questioning , the TOE  would not be as fixed as it currently is. 

Whatever either side thinks of the balance of those lists aside, our monitoring of the numbers has been key to keeping some semblance of order.

If the constant audit by the players is unwanted, Fix your systems.......

the only way to do that is red v blue.  As long as one unit has strength vs another someone will always complain about the perceived imbalance. 

[goreblimey]

I’m not talking about relative strengths of each list, I’m saying without the players questioning those lists huge mistakes have at time appeared.

 

[Mosizlak]

1 hour ago, B2K said:

We used to (somewhere floating around here are old threads by ohm with the to&e listings), the end result was exactly the same.  

And you still should be polite to PAYING customers. This isn't hard.