stg44.

[delems]

How come, and when, did axis lose half their stg44 in 1 ab garrison?

[goreblimey]

Number corrected was it? Good.

[delems]

No, it was not corrected.

Reduced too much.

[goreblimey]

You’ve been running around with 25 , nice windfall error in your favour. It should have been 10. What is it now?

[delems]

It is now 5, well last I looked yesterday.  Been 10 for ages. (but ya, bugged at 25 for a day or 2)

[delems]

Still bugged, only 5; we had 10 just a few days ago, before patch and for the last few years.

How come only 5 now?

[munda777]

That seems like a correction. Good one.

[fidd]

Anything that is not in axis favour, is a bug, if not deliberate bias. Don't you understand delems-speak yet? Next we will have a diatribe on how the absence of those 5 STG44's is driving the requirement for yet more more bridge AO's, and that this in turn "shirely" proves all axis HC officers should have STG44's to go with their extra satchel-charges! Shortly following will be "stats" demonstrating the the lack of tier 0 pz able to kill the matty means that all tier 0 pz are useless, matties are unkillable and FG42's with side-arm shrecks for all would cure this deficit.

Merry Christmas,

47 minutes ago, mundagurri said:

That seems like a correction. Good one.