Two accounts working closely: Is it cheating?

[delems]

*** germans would only attack 1 nationality

YOUR words.... not mine.

So, how is allies using brit only (1 nation) to attack axis any different?

 

You really can't see the hypocrisy and dual standard there?

So, it is a problem if axis does it, but not allies?

[B2K]

6 minutes ago, delems said:

*** germans would only attack 1 nationality

YOUR words.... not mine.

So, how is allies using brit only (1 nation) to attack axis any different?

 

You really can't see the hypocrisy and dual standard there?

So, it is a problem if axis does it, but not allies?

You're right - and AGAIN I'll ask you to point out where I said what the allies are doing is not a problem. 

You're so busy assuming what you think I'm typing, that you're not actually reading what I'm typing.  So AGAIN stop putting words into my posts that are not there. 

[fidd]

Delems is merely angling for advantage here, so he can return to the "good old days" of only having to cope with French tanks again, after throwing all his toys out of the cot and otherwise spitting the dummy over the Matilda. Usual forum-krieg nonsense when the map gets this far east. What was it last time?- oh I remember - "we don't have enough bridge AO's WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!" (implication you were losing because of a lack of them). Well, you got your extra bridge AO's, and you're still losing. maybe they were just a distraction afterall!

You think he'd be in a state of perpetual hiccups the way he chews the carpet.

FFS strap on a nut, learn to cope with the Matty, and on occasion, to lose with a good grace instead of these puerile temper-tantrums every time the axis lose. It's embarassing. What are you, three?

[jwrona]

At least he has a ridiculous baton for him to carry as the lead of the tin foil hat committee.

[delems]

*** Delems is merely angling for advantage here

LOL you hypocrite ... and allies aren't by making every frontline town brit?

And I never said we losing because of bridge AOs -  I said way to much work for HC to manage them.  Get your facts straight.  And btw, silll not enough imo;  should have 6 more.

 

All I see are allies and rats quick to condemn when axis does something to try and help themselves.... but not condemn when allies do it.

[tater]

It's partially the horrible Garrison system.

If there were a finite number of Garrisons, that might be a solution. Some nominal length of front (divided by countries for the Allies) with W/X/Y/Z% extra to incorporate bulges. (the different letters are for each country)

 

[tater]

2 minutes ago, delems said:

LOL you hypocrite ... and allies aren't by making every frontline town brit?

The system is different now, though. I'm trying to remember the way it used to work, with the gap of empty towns..

Regardless, the Allies have the problem of multiple countries, and the benefit of picking the best for a given task as a result. Much is as I said because of the dumb Garrison system. Micromanaging BDEs to play "the map" game is gone, and replaced with the larger scale country flag thing.

Instead of arbitrary limits on towns N/S/whatever, I would say finite Garrisons.

[Dre21]

2 hours ago, fidd said:

Delems is merely angling for advantage here, so he can return to the "good old days" of only having to cope with French tanks again, after throwing all his toys out of the cot and otherwise spitting the dummy over the Matilda. Usual forum-krieg nonsense when the map gets this far east. What was it last time?- oh I remember - "we don't have enough bridge AO's WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!" (implication you were losing because of a lack of them). Well, you got your extra bridge AO's, and you're still losing. maybe they were just a distraction afterall!

You think he'd be in a state of perpetual hiccups the way he chews the carpet.

FFS strap on a nut, learn to cope with the Matty, and on occasion, to lose with a good grace instead of these puerile temper-tantrums every time the axis lose. It's embarassing. What are you, three?

You know , I think we heard enough of your great ideas, come over and see if your ideas work.

You act like we haven't tried to get 88s out as soon as EWS goes on , or tried to roll a 88 into position from a different town just to get to the target town as the last AB or CP gets capped with having yet to set up. Or get to town and all the Enemy Armor is already in the AB and not a hill to be seen. Or being set up with not having one Armor roll anywhere close by , it's not like setting up on a good spot is not being used by also EI or a FMS is close by , or a ET is already there or EA seen you .

Only damn thing we haven't tried park a 88 anywhere close to a FB with the hopes that something will spawn or just spawn find a spot and hang out for hours with the hope that Allies might put an AO on that town ( sounds like great game play)

I'm tired of Allies have all the damn answers but vice versa when Allies complained and Axis tried to have a little creative criticism, we got shouted down , made fun of and whatever else you can think of.

LMG whined enough till CRS fixed it, no one came in here and said well deal with the 50 round drum , both sides could Run and Gun , but apparently the 50 round drum was a killer and needed to be taken out of the equation, cause Allies only had a 25 round .

Tigers whined long enough cause you guys didn't have the long range killer but the 17 pounder ATG so a tracked solution needed to be had , voila the Fly and Achilles . But you guys still won maps even with the Tiger in game and no Fly or Achilles.

FG42 apparently was so deadly that Allies complained campaign after campaign  no matter which way the map went , a certain Allied player came on the forum and complained every single time a Axis weapon had a bit better K/D ratio then he could tolerate. And the FG42 was his number one target right after the MG34 got fixed .

So unless you come over and try your so brilliant idea or ideas that you have I would say stuff it , cause we are getting tired of hearing that you have a solution , it not like we haven't tried .

 

You get down on Delems , you know there are Axis players that like to play the Armor game too. Why play a game where one can't use the Armor given vs the other Armor?

At least vs the French it's balanced , or should we tell you as Axis well Adjust and get over it not our damn fault the French Armor  doctrine was based on WWI and made all their tanks slow to support their Infantry , no adjusting for you guys there , is there ? No just swap out all the French with Brits problem solved , we are Allied why should we overcome and adapt when we can just ask CRS to fix it for us.

 

I'm not the only Axis player that's getting pretty tired of the double standard , so FEBRUARY 1st CRS will announce something , well a announcement is just that , we are still waiting for the JU88 since it was announced , it's been what 6 +months now .

 

 

[delems]

*** At least he has a ridiculous baton for him to carry

Ok, now I just think you are being jealous.

It is heavy, and it is made with real gold and silver.

It is an honor to carry , I will gladly accept the 'burden'.

btw, it's even more gorgeous in real life.

[hillstorm]

2 hours ago, fidd said:

Delems is merely angling for advantage here, so he can return to the "good old days" of only having to cope with French tanks again, after throwing all his toys out of the cot and otherwise spitting the dummy over the Matilda. Usual forum-krieg nonsense when the map gets this far east. What was it last time?- oh I remember - "we don't have enough bridge AO's WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!" (implication you were losing because of a lack of them). Well, you got your extra bridge AO's, and you're still losing. maybe they were just a distraction afterall!

You think he'd be in a state of perpetual hiccups the way he chews the carpet.

FFS strap on a nut, learn to cope with the Matty, and on occasion, to lose with a good grace instead of these puerile temper-tantrums every time the axis lose. It's embarassing. What are you, three?

Wow. You (and jwrona btw) are way out of line here.